Read more of Andrew Kniss' review of "GMOs, Herbicides, and Public Health" in the rest of the article. ![]() In fact, Landrigan and Benbrook acknowledge that the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) “has twice reviewed the safety of GM crops” and they do not dispute the scientific consensus expressed by NAS that “GM crops pose no unique hazards to human health.” The way I read it, the entire Perspective piece seems to be a muddled conflation of two separate (albeit related) issues the use of GMO crops and the use of herbicides. ![]() However, in the two page opinion, they provide no evidence that crop biotechnology is harmful. Philip J Landrigan 1, Charles Benbrook Affiliation 1From the Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (P.J.L. Benbrook for “ all aspects of the safety of biotechnology” to be “thoroughly reconsider”. The “Perspective” piece is basically a plea from Dr. The New England Journal of Medicine 334: 688-692. So I thought it was worth commenting here since it is related to herbicides and herbicide-resistant GMO crops. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. ![]() I was asked to review the piece this week, and I can only assume it will eventually make the rounds on social media. Charles Benbrook (PhD) titled “GMOs, Herbicides, and Public Health”. Below is an excerpt from an article by Andrew Kniss, posted by Control Freaks.Īn opinion piece was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, written by Dr. An opinion piece was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, written by Dr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |